| 発行体 | Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 1622 |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | 24 Kreuzers (⅓) |
| 通貨 | Thaler (1621-1709) |
| 材質 | Silver |
| 重量 | 3.38 g |
| 直径 | 28.5 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round |
| 製造技法 | |
| 向き | |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 |
| 表面の説明 | Shield of 4-fold arms, mintmark above. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | Latin |
| 表面の銘文 | |
| 裏面の説明 | Crowned imperial eagle, large orb on breast with 24, date at end of legend. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | Latin |
| 裏面の銘文 | |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 |
L Leutenberg, Germany |
| 鋳造数 |
1622 L - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1603102500 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This 24 Kreuzer coin, issued in 1622 under the joint rule of Charles Günther, Louis Günther, and Albert Günther of Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt, emerged during the tumultuous early years of the Thirty Years' War (1618-1648). This period, known as the Kipper- und Wipperzeit, saw widespread monetary crisis and debasement across German states. Despite its silver composition, this issue reflects the prevailing economic instability, serving as a medium of exchange in an era of rapidly depreciating currency and fiscal uncertainty.
Artistry: The artistic execution of this 24 Kreuzer piece, likely by a local mint master, embodies a transitional style blending late Renaissance and nascent Baroque aesthetics. While specific engraver details are typically unrecorded, the design would have focused on dynastic representation. Common iconography for multi-ruler issues includes composite or individual busts of the ruling brothers, surrounded by their elaborate titles and the ducal coat of arms of Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt, often featuring the Schwarzburg eagle and other armorial elements. The overall impression would be one of sober authority, typical of princely coinage.
Technical/Grading: Struck in silver (3.38 grams, 28.5 millimeters), this coin exhibits characteristics typical of early 17th-century minting. High-points for wear or strike quality include the highest relief areas of any portraiture, such as hair and facial features, and intricate details within the ducal arms. Due to manual striking methods, expect variations in strike pressure, potentially leading to areas of weakness, particularly at the periphery. Planchet irregularities, such as minor laminations or an uneven flan, are also common. A well-preserved example would show sharp detail on legends and central motifs, indicating a strong initial strike.