Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Reichsschuldenverwaltung |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1925 |
| Type | Vouchers |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Stiff white paper with an ornate dark green border frame and green-on-light-green letterpress text throughout. A red stamp impression appears at lower left, and the note has been punch-hole cancelled. The entire face is text-based with no pictorial vignette, typical of German Reich debt instruments. |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Uniface; the reverse is entirely blank white paper, bearing only the show-through of the obverse text visible from the recto, with no printed design, text, or vignette of its own. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
The Reichsschuldenverwaltung — the Reich Debt Administration — issued these bonds as part of Germany's post-inflation fiscal reconstruction following the catastrophic hyperinflation of 1921–1923. The Rentenmark stabilization of late 1923 had stopped the bleeding, but the Reich still needed to rebuild public debt instruments that the market would actually trust. These 200 Reichsmark bonds were part of that slow, deliberate process of restoring credibility to German state paper.
The watermark security was modest by contemporary standards, reflecting both cost constraints and the expectation that these instruments would circulate among institutional holders rather than the general public. Forgery risk was considered lower in that channel.