Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

200 Reichsmark Bond

Uitgever Reichsschuldenverwaltung
Jaar 1925
Type Vouchers
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Stiff white paper with an ornate dark green border frame and green-on-light-green letterpress text throughout. A red stamp impression appears at lower left, and the note has been punch-hole cancelled. The entire face is text-based with no pictorial vignette, typical of German Reich debt instruments.
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Uniface; the reverse is entirely blank white paper, bearing only the show-through of the obverse text visible from the recto, with no printed design, text, or vignette of its own.
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

The Reichsschuldenverwaltung — the Reich Debt Administration — issued these bonds as part of Germany's post-inflation fiscal reconstruction following the catastrophic hyperinflation of 1921–1923. The Rentenmark stabilization of late 1923 had stopped the bleeding, but the Reich still needed to rebuild public debt instruments that the market would actually trust. These 200 Reichsmark bonds were part of that slow, deliberate process of restoring credibility to German state paper.

The watermark security was modest by contemporary standards, reflecting both cost constraints and the expectation that these instruments would circulate among institutional holders rather than the general public. Forgery risk was considered lower in that channel.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT