Catalogue
| Émetteur | Suriname |
|---|---|
| Année | 1679 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | 2 Duit (2 Duiten) (1⁄80) |
| Devise | Guilder (16th century-1817) |
| Composition | Copper |
| Poids | |
| Diamètre | 20 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | KM#3, Scholt II#1435a |
| Description de l’avers | Parrot on a branch with two leaves. Denomination above and year below. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | Latin |
| Légende de l’avers |
2 AN・1679 (Translation: Year) |
| Description du revers | Ornamental tree surrounded by a circle of dashes. |
| Écriture du revers | |
| Légende du revers | |
| Tranche | |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
1679 - - |
| ID Numisquare | 3010107360 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: Issued in 1679, this 2 Duiten 'Papegaaitje' Tree coin originates from Suriname, then a crucial Dutch colony. Acquired from the English in 1667, Suriname was administered by the Dutch West India Company (WIC) and later the Society of Suriname. This era consolidated Dutch control and expanded its plantation economy, necessitating stable local currency. The 'Papegaaitje' series served as a vital low-denomination copper issue for colonial commerce.
Artistry: While the specific engraver is unrecorded, the coin's design adheres to pragmatic Dutch colonial numismatic traditions. The 'Papegaaitje' moniker often refers to a parrot motif, though this 'Tree' variant (KM#3) likely features a distinct arboreal design, perhaps a palm or native tree, symbolizing the colony's natural resources. This imagery contrasted with the common WIC monogram, providing unique visual identity. The style is utilitarian, prioritizing clear legibility of value and issuer over intricate artistic embellishment, characteristic of functional colonial coinage.
Technical/Grading: As a copper issue from a colonial mint, the 1679 2 Duiten 'Papegaaitje' Tree often exhibits technical limitations. High-points susceptible to wear typically include the raised elements of the tree's foliage, any lettering, and the date. Strike quality varies significantly, with common weakness, especially on opposing sides or near the rims, due to inconsistent striking pressure. Planchet quality also ranges, with flaws like laminations or uneven surfaces frequently observed. Well-struck examples with full details and minimal wear are highly sought after by collectors.