目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
10 Heller Neustadtl an der Donau, Nabegg, Judenhof, Windpassing, Klein Wolfstein
| 发行方 | Neustadtl an der Donau, Nabegg, Judenhof, Windpassing, and Klein Wolfstein, Municipalities of |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 1920 |
| 类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 面值 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 货币 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 材质 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 尺寸 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 形状 | Rectangular |
| 印刷机构 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 设计师 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 雕刻师 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 流通至 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 参考资料 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面描述 | Printed on buff paper in dark ink, the obverse carries the denomination numeral '10' at upper left and right, with the cursive letterpress heading 'Gutschein der Ortsgruppe der Gemeinden' across the top. A central framed panel bears the calligraphic names of the five issuing municipalities in large script. To the left of the central panel is a line-drawn vignette of a church tower with adjacent buildings, while to the right stands a vignette of a plague column or wayside monument set against a landscape. Below the frame, the names of the five Bürgermeister (mayors) are printed in cursive script alongside the validity statement 'Giltig bis 31 Dezember 1920.' |
|---|---|
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 10 Gutschein 10 Heller Die 5 Gemeinden haften gemeinsam und haben eine Bedeckungsrücklage bestellt Giltig bis 31. Dezember 1920 Entwurf: Steff Reineck Druck von F. Klefer, Amstetten. |
| 签名 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪类型 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 防伪描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 变体 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 备注 |
A joint issue from five Lower Austrian municipalities — Neustadtl an der Donau, Nabegg, Judenhof, Windpassing, and Klein Wolfstein — this 10 Heller notgeld dates from 1920, when the collapse of the Habsburg monetary system left rural communities scrambling to produce their own fractional currency. The printer, F. Kiefer of Amstetten, handled several regional notgeld commissions during this period, keeping production local and costs manageable. Designer Steff Reineck's involvement suggests a degree of deliberate artistic commission rather than purely utilitarian output.
Multi-municipality joint issues of this kind are less common than single-issuer notgeld, and the administrative coordination required across five separate communities makes surviving examples modestly interesting from a fiscal history standpoint.