Catálogo
| Emissor | Autokane |
|---|---|
| Ano | 350 BC - 300 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | |
| Moeda | Drachm |
| Composição | Bronze |
| Peso | 1.1 g |
| Diâmetro | 10 mm |
| Espessura | |
| Formato | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | Hammered |
| Orientação | |
| Gravador(es) | |
| Em circulação até | |
| Referência(s) | SNG Ashmolean#1259 |
| Descrição do anverso | Laureate head of Zeus facing right. |
|---|---|
| Escrita do anverso | |
| Legenda do anverso | |
| Descrição do reverso | Head of Dionysios right |
| Escrita do reverso | Greek |
| Legenda do reverso |
AYTOKA (Translation: Autokane) |
| Bordo | |
| Casa da moeda | |
| Tiragem |
ND (350 BC - 300 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 8083468790 |
| Informações adicionais |
Historical Context: This Æ10 coin, issued by Autokane between 350 and 300 BC, originates from Lycia, a region of southwestern Anatolia. Autokane was a local dynast who maintained a degree of autonomy amidst the geopolitical shifts following the decline of the Achaemenid Empire and the rise of Macedonian power. Bronze issues like this served as essential small change for daily commerce within his domain, reflecting the economic self-sufficiency and political identity of his rule.
Artistry: The design of this diminutive bronze piece, constrained by its 10mm flan, adhered to late Classical Lycian coinage conventions. While engravers for such small denominations are typically anonymous, the stylistic school blended indigenous Lycian iconography with broader Hellenistic influences. Obverse designs often featured a deity’s head or local symbol, while reverses commonly depicted an animal or monogram, executed with a directness necessitated by the limited surface area. The artistry provides insight into local aesthetic preferences.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 1.1 grams, this Æ10 exemplifies the technical challenges of striking small bronze denominations. Key high-points susceptible to wear include highest relief elements like hair, nose, or prominent animal features. Technical strike qualities often vary, with common issues including slight off-centering, inconsistent pressure leading to partial strikes, and irregular planchet shapes. A well-struck example exhibits clear details on both sides with minimal planchet flaws, making such pieces desirable for their historical integrity.