Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
1 Uncia Telamon?
| Uitgever | Uncertain Etruscan mint |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 301 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | 23 mm |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Heavily worn and encrusted bronze flan of irregular outline, characteristic of Etruscan cast or hammered coinage. The obverse presents a design rendered in low relief, now largely obscured by corrosion and patination, consistent with the known typology of Etruscan uncia issues from this period. The abbreviated mint legend TLAM, tentatively associated with the Etruscan coastal city of Telamon, appears in the field. The overall execution reflects the archaic, provincial style typical of Central Italian bronze coinages of the 3rd century BC. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | TLAM (Translation: [Telamon?]) |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The so-called "Telamon" designation for this series remains debated — some scholars tie it to the Battle of Telamon in 225 BC, where a Roman-led force crushed a Gaesatae-led Gallic coalition in Etruria, theorizing that nearby mints struck emergency or victory-related issues in the aftermath. That connection is unproven and contested. What is clearer is that the issuing authority remains genuinely unresolved, with attributions spread across several Etruscan centers depending on which catalog you trust.
Haeberlin's die studies remain the most rigorous framework for this group, though the corpus is small enough that new specimens still shift the picture.