Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

1 Tremissis In the name of Leo I

Uitgever Uncertain Germanic tribes
Jaar 475-510
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Depeyr Arl#–, RIC X#cf. 611
Beschrijving voorzijde Pearl-diademed, draped, and cuirassed bust of Emperor Leo I facing right, rendered in the late antique imperial style typical of barbarous tremisses. The effigy is encircled by a beaded border, with a degraded Latin legend arranged around the periphery of the flan. The portrait, while clearly derived from official Eastern Roman prototypes, displays the characteristic stylisation and simplification associated with Germanic imitative coinage.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde D N LEO PE - RPET AVC
(Translation: Dominus Noster Leo Perpetuus Augustus Our Lord, Leo, perpetual August)
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

After the deposition of Romulus Augustulus in 476, several Germanic successor powers continued striking gold tremisses in the names of legitimate Eastern emperors — Leo I among them — as a way of borrowing imperial monetary authority without possessing it. The practice was as much political as economic: coinage in a recognized emperor's name passed in trade where invented barbarian issues might not. Leo I had actually died in 474, making these posthumous strikes in his name a deliberate archaism.

Attribution remains genuinely contested. The cf. notation against RIC X 611 signals a die relationship without exact correspondence.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT