Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Government of Bangladesh |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1979 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | 100 × 60 mm |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | A vignette at left centre presents three chital (spotted deer) in intaglio — a stag, a doe, and a fawn — rendered in fine engraved detail against a light ground. The design is framed by a purple guilloche border panel at left carrying the numeral ১ at top and bottom, while an oval watermark window occupies the right portion of the note; Bengali and Arabic numeral denomination inscriptions appear at lower right. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Watermark |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Bangladesh's 1 Taka notes have historically been issued by the Ministry of Finance rather than Bangladesh Bank, making them government obligations rather than central bank currency — a distinction that matters legally even if it's invisible to ordinary users. The P#6A is among the earlier Munich-era Giesecke & Devrient printings for the young republic, which gained independence in 1971 and was still building its monetary infrastructure through the late 1970s.
Watermark security on a note of this low denomination was not a given — many issuing authorities skipped it as a cost measure. That G&D applied it here reflects the contract specifications rather than any particular concern about forgery at the 1 Taka level.