1 Shilling Without legend

发行方 Kenya
年份 1966-1968
类型 Standard circulation coin
面值 1 Shilling (1 KES)
货币 Shilling (1966-date)
材质 Copper-nickel (75% Copper, 25% Nickel)
重量 7.9 g
直径 27.8 mm
厚度 1.55 mm
形状 Round
制作工艺 Milled
方向 Medal alignment ↑↑
雕刻师 N. Sillman
流通至 31 December 2011
参考资料 KM#5, Schön#5
正面描述 Coat of arms of Kenya dividing date.
正面文字 Latin
正面铭文 REPUBLIC OF KENYA 1968 HARAMBEE 1 ONE SHILLING
(Translation: All pull together.)
背面描述 Bust of president Mzee Jomo Kenyatta facing left. Without legend.
背面文字
背面铭文
边缘 Reeded
铸币厂
铸造量 1966 - - 20 000 000
1966 - Proof - 27
1967 - - 4 000 000
1968 - - 8 000 000
Numisquare 编号 3907603310
附加信息

Historical Context: This 1 Shilling coin, issued by Kenya between 1966 and 1968, marks a crucial phase in the nation's post-independence monetary history. Under President Jomo Kenyatta, Kenya was establishing its distinct national identity and economic sovereignty, transitioning from the East African Currency Board. This "Without legend" issue underscores an early republican design philosophy, asserting Kenya's newly forged autonomy and a clear departure from colonial numismatic traditions.

Artistry: The obverse features a dignified portrait of President Jomo Kenyatta, a common motif for newly independent nations. While specific engraver details for this variant are often unrecorded, the stylistic approach aligns with post-colonial realism, emphasizing national pride. The reverse, notable for its lack of a country legend, presents the denomination and year, likely accompanied by the national emblem of a shield and crossed spears, rendered with a clean, unadorned aesthetic. This minimalist design choice highlights central motifs without extraneous text.

Technical/Grading: Struck in robust copper-nickel, this coin generally exhibits good strike quality. Key high-points for assessing wear on the obverse include President Kenyatta's hair, eyebrow, and cheekbone. On the reverse, critical areas are the intricate details of the shield's design and the sharp tips of the crossed spears. Collectors should examine these features for loss of detail. Field preservation and absence of significant bag marks are also important for higher grades, given the large, open fields typical of this era's coinage.

×