Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Ulster Bank Limited |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1929-1934 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | 1 Pound |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Ulster Bank Limited Northern Ireland Issue I Promise to pay the Bearer on Demand One Pound Sterling at the Head Office of the Bank in Belfast For the Ulster Bank Limited Belfast |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | The reverse is plain unprinted paper, showing fold lines and light surface aging consistent with a note of this period, with no design elements or lettering present. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Ulster Bank Limited was a Belfast-based institution with deep roots in the Ulster provincial banking tradition, but its notes of this period were printed in London by Charles Skipper & East — the same firm responsible for numerous colonial and private bank issues across the British world. The arrangement was entirely typical of Irish private banking practice, where even regionally proud institutions contracted their security printing to established London trade printers rather than maintaining domestic facilities.
Charles Skipper & East had merged with Waterlow & Sons by the early 1930s, meaning later printings in this 1929–1934 window may have passed through a transitional production environment even if the imprint remained unchanged.