Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
1 Pound Ulster Bank
| Issuer | Ulster Bank Limited |
|---|---|
| Year | 1929-1934 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Pound |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Ulster Bank Limited Northern Ireland Issue I Promise to pay the Bearer on Demand One Pound Sterling at the Head Office of the Bank in Belfast For the Ulster Bank Limited Belfast |
| Reverse description | The reverse is plain unprinted paper, showing fold lines and light surface aging consistent with a note of this period, with no design elements or lettering present. |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Ulster Bank Limited was a Belfast-based institution with deep roots in the Ulster provincial banking tradition, but its notes of this period were printed in London by Charles Skipper & East — the same firm responsible for numerous colonial and private bank issues across the British world. The arrangement was entirely typical of Irish private banking practice, where even regionally proud institutions contracted their security printing to established London trade printers rather than maintaining domestic facilities.
Charles Skipper & East had merged with Waterlow & Sons by the early 1930s, meaning later printings in this 1929–1934 window may have passed through a transitional production environment even if the imprint remained unchanged.