Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Kaufmännischer Verein / Vorschußverein Trebnitz |
|---|---|
| Year | |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | 37 × 27 mm |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Printed on pink paper, the obverse is framed by a simple rectangular border. A serial number prefixed by 'Nr.' appears in the upper portion within a secondary ruled box. The large numeral '1' is printed centrally in bold type, with the denomination 'Pfennig' below it in Roman type, and the issuer inscription 'Kaufmännischer Verein Trebnitz Schl.' occupying the lower panel. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Der Vorschußverein Trebnitz zahlt gegen diesen Gutschein 1 Pf. Nicht zusammenfalten |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | Log in to see details |
| Comments |
Trebnitz — now Trzebnica in Lower Silesia — was a small Prussian market town, and the joint issuance by both a merchants' association and a credit cooperative points to a local economy tight enough that two distinct institutions pooled resources to solve a small-change shortage. These fractional Pfennig notgeld pieces from merchants' and advance credit associations are among the most ephemeral paper issues in the German local currency record; at 37 × 27 mm, survival was always unlikely.
The Tieste catalog distinguishes this piece from a companion issue by typeface alone — roman versus gothic — suggesting the two were printed in separate runs, possibly by different local printers.