Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
1 Para - Mahmud II
| Issuer | Tripoli, Regency of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1808-1828 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The reverse field bears a multi-line Arabic inscription denoting the mint city and the regnal year, struck in bold relief across the flan. The legend references Tripoli in the West (Tarabulus Gharb) and the Hijri year 1223, identifying both the place and period of issue. A beaded border frames the design, consistent with the obverse treatment. The strike is characteristically uneven, with portions of the legend compressed or slightly weak at the edges due to the irregular hammered flan. The surface shows typical patination associated with copper Ottoman provincial issues. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | ضرب في طرابلس غرب ١٢٢٣ (Translation: Struck in Tripoli West 1223) |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Regency of Tripoli occupied an odd constitutional position during these years — nominally Ottoman, but effectively governed by the Karamanli dynasty, whose authority over coinage was largely autonomous in practice. Mahmud II's name appears on these issues as a formality of suzerainty rather than any meaningful assertion of Istanbul's control over Tripolitan monetary affairs. The Karamanli grip on Tripoli would collapse entirely in 1835, when the Ottomans used a succession dispute as pretext to reassert direct rule and end over a century of dynastic semi-independence.