Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Inalids of Amid |
|---|---|
| Year | 1141-1183 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Reverse of the host follis, largely obliterated by wear and corrosion typical of heavily circulated copper coinage. A faint curved line or partial border device is discernible in the upper field, possibly a remnant of the original host coin's design. The remainder of the reverse field is essentially featureless, with the surface showing significant oxidation and pitting consistent with prolonged circulation and burial. No legible legend or device can be confidently identified. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain. |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The Inalid dynasty controlled Amid (modern Diyarbakır in southeastern Turkey) as vassals of the Artuqids and later the Zengids, occupying an awkward political position between competing Turkic and Kurdish powers throughout the twelfth century. Countermarking existing folles rather than striking fresh coinage was a practical assertion of local authority — it cost less and moved faster than organizing a full mint operation, particularly for a minor ruler whose tenure was defined more by diplomacy than military dominance.
Jamal al-Din Mahmud ruled Amid for over four decades, an unusually long reign for a vassal lord of this period. The countermark on this piece dates its reclassification to somewhere within that window, but pinning it tighter than that is not currently possible.