| İhraççı | Saxe-Weimar, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 1675-1682 |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | 1 Dreier = 3 Pfennig (1⁄96) |
| Para birimi | Thaler (1572-1740) |
| Bileşim | Silver |
| Ağırlık | |
| Çap | |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round |
| Teknik | |
| Yönlendirme | Medal alignment ↑↑ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | KoppeSW#417 , KM#99 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | 3 shielded arms |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | IE HZG 1681 |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Imperial orb within cartouche. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | |
| Arka yüz lejandı | 3 |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
1675 - - 1676 - - 1677 - - 1681 - - 1682 - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 1170853460 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This 1 Dreier, issued by John Ernest II of Saxe-Weimar (r. 1662-1683), dates from a post-Thirty Years' War period (1675-1682) of relative stability within the Holy Roman Empire. Saxe-Weimar, an Ernestine Wettin duchy, asserted its monetary prerogative. The Dreier (3 Pfennig) was essential small change, reflecting economic recovery and facilitating local commerce. These issues underscored ducal authority, maintaining a stable denominational structure vital for daily transactions in fragmented German territories.
Artistry: The artistic execution aligns with the late Baroque numismatic style prevalent in smaller German states. Specific engravers for such low-denomination coinage are rarely documented; dies were likely cut by a local mint master. Designs typically feature a simplified ducal monogram or bust of John Ernest II on the obverse, encircled by titles, and a rendered ducal coat of arms on the reverse. This style prioritizes functional formality, legibility, and conventional heraldry over intricate artistic flourish, characteristic of mass-produced currency.
Technical/Grading: Key grading diagnostics for this 1 Dreier include the definition of John Ernest II's wig and facial features on the obverse, often first areas to show wear or incomplete strike. The small lettering of the surrounding legend, including titles and date, must be sharp and fully legible. On the reverse, intricate details of the ducal arms, especially quarterings, are critical. Weak strikes or planchet imperfections, common for small silver issues, significantly affect eye appeal and grade, particularly if details are lost at the flan's edge.