Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

1 Drachm

Uitgever Dahae tribes
Jaar 101 BC - 1 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Stylized male head facing right in high relief, rendered in a bold, abstracted barbarian artistic tradition derived from late Hellenistic prototypes. The facial features are broadly modeled, with a prominent eye depicted in schematic form and a simplified nose and mouth. The hair or headdress is indicated by a border of pellets or beaded decorative elements encircling the periphery of the flan. The overall style reflects the local Central Asian adaptation of Greek coin iconography, characteristic of tribal issues of the Dahae peoples of the eastern Iranian steppe.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (101 BC - 1 BC) - Struck circa 1st century BC
Aanvullende informatie

The Dahae were a loose confederation of nomadic Iranian-speaking peoples along the eastern Caspian steppe, better known to history as the group from which the Parthian dynasty ultimately traced its founding stock. Their coinage — where it can be attributed with confidence — tends to shadow Parthian issues so closely in fabric and type that attribution debates remain unresolved for a substantial portion of surviving examples.

The century-long date range reflects scholarly uncertainty more than actual production span.