Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 225-325 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Standing figure facing left, rendered in a simplified barbarous imitative style, holding an uncertain object in the right hand, possibly a Victory statuette, and a scepter or spear in the left hand. The design loosely copies a standard Roman imperial reverse type associated with Marcus Aurelius or Septimius Severus denarii. The figure is surrounded by a degenerate pseudo-legend composed of garbled Latin letterforms arranged in an irregular manner around the field. The overall engraving is crude, consistent with a non-professional Germanic workshop imitating official Roman coinage. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Barbarous imitations of Roman denarii proliferated across the Germanic frontier during the third century, a period when official Roman silver was being debased so aggressively that the distinction between an imperial coin and a tribal copy sometimes mattered less than its silver content. These pieces were struck by communities outside the limes who had absorbed enough Roman metalworking knowledge to produce credible — if stylistically degraded — coinage, likely for use in cross-border trade or mercenary payment.
The attribution range spanning both Marcus Aurelius and Septimius Severus prototypes reflects a common problem with this material: Germanic die-cutters frequently copied from worn or mixed exemplars, collapsing decades of imperial portraiture into a single muddled type.