Vollständige Bilder anzeigen — kostenlose Registrierung
Mit Google fortfahren — kostenlos oder mit E-Mail registrieren

1 Centavo Pattern strike

Emittent Nicaragua
Jahr 1860
Typ Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Nennwert Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Währung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Material Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Gewicht Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Durchmesser Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Dicke Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Form Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägetechnik Milled
Ausrichtung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Stempelschneider Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Im Umlauf bis Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Referenz(en) Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversbeschreibung Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Aversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Averslegende LIBERTAD Y UNION
(Translation: Freedom and Union)
Reversbeschreibung The central field bears the denomination and date inscribed in three lines — UN / CENTABO / 1860 — within a beaded inner circle, notably featuring the misspelling CENTABO in place of the correct CENTAVO, a die error characteristic of this pattern issue. The circular peripheral legend REPUBLICA DE NICARAGUA runs around the outer field between the beaded circle and the plain rim. The design is entirely typographic, with no figurative elements, and the large, bold lettering fills the field in a straightforward, utilitarian manner.
Reversschrift Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Reverslegende Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Rand Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Prägestätte Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Auflage Anmelden um Details zu sehen
Zusätzliche Informationen

Nicaragua's coinage history in the 1860s is fragmented and poorly documented, and this pattern is a direct artifact of that instability. The young republic was still negotiating the basic infrastructure of a national monetary system, and pattern strikes from this period were almost certainly produced at a foreign mint — most probably in Birmingham or Paris — to demonstrate viability before any production contract was awarded. No regular-issue 1 centavo in copper was struck for 1860, which is precisely why this piece exists: it never made it past the proposal stage.