Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

1 As

Uitgever Uncertain city of Central Italy
Jaar 301 BC - 201 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Bust of a female deity facing right, wearing a crested Corinthian-style helmet; the head is rendered in bold, archaic relief characteristic of Central Italian aes grave coinage. The facial features are summarily modeled, with the helmet visor and cheek-guard clearly delineated. The design is contained within a plain incuse field typical of cast bronze issues of this period. No legend or inscription is present.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Bare male head facing right, likely representing a deity or heroic figure, wearing a plain diadem or fillet bound around the hair. The head is rendered in high, rounded relief consistent with the cast technique employed for Central Italian aes grave coinage of the third to second century BC. The facial features are boldly if summarily executed, with the hair rendered in schematic locks above the diadem. No legend or inscription is present in the flat, unadorned field.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Heavy cast bronze of this weight places it squarely within the earliest phase of Roman-influenced aes grave production in Central Italy, before the progressive weight reductions of the Second Punic War systematically drove the as down from the Etrusco-Campanian standard. The issuing city remains unidentified with certainty — Haeberlin's attribution has been contested without resolution, and the piece continues to circulate through scholarship under a deliberately vague regional tag.