Catalogue
| Émetteur | Principality of Chach |
|---|---|
| Année | 601-801 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Valeur | |
| Devise | |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Poids | 1.73 g |
| Diamètre | 20 mm |
| Épaisseur | |
| Forme | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| En circulation jusqu’à | |
| Référence(s) | Sh&K#231 |
| Description de l’avers | Lion or snow leopard walking left with Sogdian word above. |
|---|---|
| Écriture de l’avers | Sogdian |
| Légende de l’avers |
xwbw (Translation: Ruler) |
| Description du revers | Pitchfork-like tamgha of Chach surrounded by Sogdian legend. |
| Écriture du revers | Sogdian |
| Légende du revers |
xwbw prn st/wck (Translation: Coin of the Ruler Stachak) |
| Tranche | Smooth. |
| Atelier | |
| Tirage |
ND (601-801) - Backwards xwbw prn - ND (601-801) - Regular xwbw prn - |
| ID Numisquare | 2589050550 |
| Informations supplémentaires |
Historical Context: This Æ unit, Sh&K#231, was issued by the Principality of Chach between 601 and 801 CE. It names Stachak Chach, likely a local ruler or title, whose precise historical identity is obscure, typical for Central Asia's fragmented political landscape. Chach, a vital Silk Road hub, maintained autonomy, issuing coinage reflecting local economic needs and political authority during a transition period following the Western Turkic Khaganate's decline and prior to full Islamic consolidation.
Artistry: The obverse design features a figure, presumably Stachak Chach, walking left, accompanied by a legend. This iconography draws from established Sogdian numismatic traditions, often depicting rulers or deities. The absence of additional symbols suggests deliberate simplification, focusing on the direct representation of the ruler and his titulature. Engravers were likely local artisans, whose work, though perhaps lacking imperial sophistication, effectively conveyed authority and facilitated commerce.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze (20mm, 1.73g), this piece exhibits characteristics common to regional issues. High-points susceptible to wear typically include the head, shoulders, and leading leg of the walking figure, along with the raised elements of the obverse legend. Strike quality often varies, with irregular flans and potential for off-center strikes or flatness from uneven die pressure. A well-preserved example shows clear definition in the figure's outline and a legible legend, crucial for assessing grade.