Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Unknown Æ - Rast Middle Period
| Uitgever | Choresmia (ancient) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 401-501 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | 18.22 mm |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Diademed royal bust facing right, surmounted by a bird ornament or finial atop the crown. The effigy is rendered in the schematic Choresmian artistic tradition, with the facial features and headdress details characteristic of the Afrigid dynastic coinage of the Middle Period. The flan is irregular and heavily worn, with the relief softened by circulation and corrosion. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Chorasmia occupied the lower Oxus delta region — modern Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan — and maintained its own coinage tradition largely independent of both Sasanian and Sogdian monetary influence during this period. The "Rast Middle Period" designation follows Vainberg's classification of the local dynastic sequence, a chronology still contested among specialists working from the Zeno corpus and Soviet-era excavation reports. Attribution remains uncertain enough that "Unknown Æ" is the honest call.