Katalog
| Emitent | Argos |
|---|---|
| Rok | 90 BC - 40 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Triobol (1/2) |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Silver |
| Waga | 2.35 g |
| Średnica | 15 mm |
| Grubość | |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered, Incuse |
| Orientacja | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | Peloponnesos#1170 5#690 Greek#110 Copenhagen#46 |
| Opis awersu | Forepart of wolf at bay to right. |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Large A; magistrate’s name in three lines around, harpa right below crossbar; all within incuse square. |
| Pismo rewersu | Greek |
| Legenda rewersu | A ΓA Θ O KΛEOΣ |
| Krawędź | |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (90 BC - 40 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 5475912840 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Triobol, bearing the name Agathokleos, originates from Argos during the turbulent period of 90-40 BC. Agathokleos was likely a prominent magistrate or civic official overseeing the city's minting operations. This era saw Greek city-states increasingly under Roman influence, yet Argos maintained its autonomy in issuing coinage, reflecting its enduring economic vitality and civic identity. The production of a silver triobol underscores the city's continued participation in regional trade networks and its ability to manage local monetary policy.
Artistry: The artistic execution of this Triobol reflects late Hellenistic stylistic traditions prevalent in the Peloponnese. While the specific engraver remains anonymous, Argive die-sinkers were tasked with rendering traditional civic iconography, likely featuring deities like Hera or local heroes, within the compact 15mm flan. The design would typically exhibit a blend of classical idealism and naturalistic tendencies, demonstrating the skill required to imbue such a small denomination with recognizable and aesthetically pleasing imagery, characteristic of Greek numismatic art.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a 2.35 gram silver flan, the technical quality of this Triobol is paramount for detail retention. Key high-points, such as hair, facial features, and intricate drapery or symbolic elements, are critical for assessing strike quality. A well-centered and evenly struck example would exhibit full detail on both obverse and reverse, with clear legends and crisp devices. Flaws like off-centering, weak strikes, or flan imperfections would significantly impact its numismatic grade and aesthetic appeal.