Triobol - Agathokleos

Émetteur Argos
Année 90 BC - 40 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Valeur Triobol (1/2)
Devise Drachm
Composition Silver
Poids 2.35 g
Diamètre 15 mm
Épaisseur
Forme Round (irregular)
Technique Hammered, Incuse
Orientation Variable alignment ↺
Graveur(s)
En circulation jusqu’à
Référence(s) Peloponnesos#1170 5#690 Greek#110 Copenhagen#46
Description de l’avers Forepart of wolf at bay to right.
Écriture de l’avers
Légende de l’avers
Description du revers Large A; magistrate’s name in three lines around, harpa right below crossbar; all within incuse square.
Écriture du revers Greek
Légende du revers A ΓA Θ O KΛEOΣ
Tranche
Atelier
Tirage ND (90 BC - 40 BC) - -
ID Numisquare 5475912840
Informations supplémentaires

Historical Context: This Triobol, bearing the name Agathokleos, originates from Argos during the turbulent period of 90-40 BC. Agathokleos was likely a prominent magistrate or civic official overseeing the city's minting operations. This era saw Greek city-states increasingly under Roman influence, yet Argos maintained its autonomy in issuing coinage, reflecting its enduring economic vitality and civic identity. The production of a silver triobol underscores the city's continued participation in regional trade networks and its ability to manage local monetary policy.

Artistry: The artistic execution of this Triobol reflects late Hellenistic stylistic traditions prevalent in the Peloponnese. While the specific engraver remains anonymous, Argive die-sinkers were tasked with rendering traditional civic iconography, likely featuring deities like Hera or local heroes, within the compact 15mm flan. The design would typically exhibit a blend of classical idealism and naturalistic tendencies, demonstrating the skill required to imbue such a small denomination with recognizable and aesthetically pleasing imagery, characteristic of Greek numismatic art.

Technical/Grading: Struck on a 2.35 gram silver flan, the technical quality of this Triobol is paramount for detail retention. Key high-points, such as hair, facial features, and intricate drapery or symbolic elements, are critical for assessing strike quality. A well-centered and evenly struck example would exhibit full detail on both obverse and reverse, with clear legends and crisp devices. Flaws like off-centering, weak strikes, or flan imperfections would significantly impact its numismatic grade and aesthetic appeal.

×