Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Thaler Double-headed eagle

Uitgever City of Lucerne
Jaar 1622
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Thaler (1550-1656)
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Within a beaded inner circle, a crowned imperial double-headed eagle displayed, its wings spread, with the Lucerne city arms — a shield divided per pale — superimposed on the eagle's breast. The date 1622 appears divided across the lower field, flanking the eagle's talons. A circular Latin legend runs along the periphery, separated from the inner circle by a plain border.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Latin
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Lucerne struck thalers under the authority granted by the Holy Roman Empire to Swiss cantons and cities, but 1622 places this piece squarely within the Kipper und Wipper crisis — one of the worst currency debasements in early modern European history. Neighboring states were flooding circulation with underweight, debased coinage to extract silver profit, and the pressure on honest issuers like Lucerne was considerable. A full-weight thaler from this moment is not an unremarkable survival.

Wielandt's attribution as L#84 and KM#24 confirms this as a recognized type rather than an off-metal or trial piece. The Haas reference adds a third concordance, suggesting enough surviving examples exist for cross-catalog study.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT