Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Tetrobol - Uncertain Dynast
| Uitgever | Lycia, Dynasts of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 500 BC - 480 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Tetrobol (⅔) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Deeply incuse square divided by a cruciform pattern into four equal rectangular compartments, each containing a single raised pellet at its center. The incuse is sharply struck and rectilinear, consistent with early Greek hammered coinage technique. The surrounding field is flat and unadorned, with no inscription or additional devices. |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Lycian dynastic coinage of this period predates the region's absorption into the Achaemenid satrapal system as a formal administrative unit, and the inability to attribute this piece to a named dynast is itself historically telling — the dynastic record for early fifth-century Lycia remains poorly reconstructed, with several rulers known only from coin types rather than any textual source. Müseler's classification of this group under uncertain issuers reflects ongoing scholarly disagreement rather than numismatic laziness.