Catálogo
| Emisor | Eretria |
|---|---|
| Año | 180 BC |
| Tipo | Standard circulation coin |
| Valor | Tetrobol (⅔) |
| Moneda | Drachm |
| Composición | Silver |
| Peso | 2.71 g |
| Diámetro | 16 mm |
| Grosor | |
| Forma | Round (irregular) |
| Técnica | Hammered |
| Orientación | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Grabador(es) | |
| En circulación hasta | |
| Referencia(s) | BCD Euboia#– Copenhagen#499 |
| Descripción del anverso | Head of female right. |
|---|---|
| Escritura del anverso | |
| Leyenda del anverso | |
| Descripción del reverso | Two grape bunches on vine. |
| Escritura del reverso | Greek |
| Leyenda del reverso | EPETPIEΩN ΦIΛIΠΠΟΣ |
| Canto | |
| Casa de moneda | |
| Tirada |
ND (-180) - after 180 BC - |
| ID de Numisquare | 5888623830 |
| Información adicional |
Historical Context: Eretria, a prominent city on Euboia, issued this silver tetrobol around 180 BC, a period of significant Hellenistic transition. The "Philip" designation likely refers to a local magistrate, not Philip V of Macedon, underscoring Eretria's continued civic autonomy. Post-Cynoscephalae (197 BC) and Macedonian decline, Eretria, despite external influences, maintained its right to mint. This tetrobol signifies Eretria's economic vitality and assertion of identity amidst rising Roman presence in the Greek East.
Artistry: Artistically, this tetrobol aligns with prevailing Hellenistic Greek stylistic traditions of the early second century BC. Engravers remain anonymous, but the coin typically features a finely rendered obverse portrait, often a local nymph (Euboia or Arethusa) or Artemis, reflecting Eretria's heritage. The reverse commonly displays a bull, a powerful symbol linked to local cults. Execution aimed for idealized form with naturalistic touches, showcasing the mint's die-cutters' skill in miniature sculptural reliefs.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 2.71 grams and measuring 16 millimeters, this silver tetrobol represents a standard fractional denomination. For optimal grading, collectors seek a strong, centered strike fully revealing details of both obverse portrait and reverse device. Key high-points include the hair and facial features of the obverse figure, and the bull's musculature, horns, and hooves. Flan quality, die wear, and strike pressure are crucial technical considerations. A well-preserved example exhibits sharp details and minimal circulation wear, retaining original luster.