See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Uncertain Punic mint, Lilybaion or Entella

Issuer Uncertain Punic mint
Year 320 BC - 300 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 17.12 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Facing right, the wreathed head of the goddess Tanit is rendered in fine Sicilian style, her hair gathered beneath a wreath of grain leaves. She wears a triple-pendant earring and a pearl necklace, framing an elegantly modeled profile. Four dolphins are disposed around the field, symbolizing the maritime character of the Punic western Mediterranean world.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A powerful horse's head faces left with a flowing, finely detailed mane cascading down the neck, rendered in high relief characteristic of Sicilian die-cutting. To the left stands a tall palm tree, the emblematic symbol of Carthage and Phoenician culture. In the lower exergual area, a Punic inscription reads in Neo-Punic characters, translating as 'People of the Camp' (Mahane or Camp mint), identifying the issuing civic or military authority.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Punic Sicily in this period was a battleground for monetary influence as much as military control. Carthage used its Sicilian mints — Lilybaion and Entella among the most productive — to pay mercenary armies in the field, meaning these tetradrachms circulated less as trade currency and more as military payroll. The attribution to a single mint remains unresolved; Jenkins and Lewis identified the Group IV issues as a stylistic cluster without pinning down a precise workshop, and the debate has not definitively closed since their 1964 corpus.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE