See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Siegesreiter Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 315 BC - 294 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 14.23 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A nude or lightly draped rider on horseback advancing to the right, holding a palm branch aloft in the Celtic imitative tradition of the Macedonian Philip II tetradrachm reverse type. The inscription ΦΙΛΙΠΠ-OΥ is distributed around the field, referencing the original Macedonian royal legend. Secondary control symbols appear below the horse, including the letter Λ and a torch, with a kantharos depicted before the horse. The overall composition reflects a Celtic reinterpretation of the Macedonian 'Siegesreiter' (victory rider) motif, with some stylistic simplification characteristic of barbarian imitative issues.
Reverse script Greek
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The "Siegesreiter" (victory rider) tetradrachms represent Celtic coinage derived from the Philip II Macedonian prototype, spreading northward and westward as Celtic groups encountered — and plundered — Macedonian silver during the late 4th century BC. The attribution to "uncertain Eastern European Celts" reflects a genuine scholarly impasse: die studies and find-spot analysis have not yet resolved whether these were struck by a single tribal authority or across multiple groups sharing a common stylistic tradition.

Kostial's classification remains the working reference for this type, though the hoard evidence underlying the date range is itself contested.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE