Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Tetradrachm Ohrlocke Type
| Uitgever | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Drachm |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Celticised laureate and bearded male head facing right, derived from the Macedonian prototype of Philip II or Alexander III. The hair is rendered in thick, schematised locks swept back from the brow, with a prominent looped curl (Ohrlocke) descending beside the ear — the defining characteristic of this type. The beard is depicted in stylised, comma-shaped tufts typical of Eastern Celtic die-cutting, and the facial features are boldly modelled in a vigorous, abstracted manner. The field is plain and unlettered. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (300 BC - 201 BC) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
The "Ohrlocke" types — named for the distinctive curl of hair descending beside the ear on the obverse — represent one of the more contested groupings in Celtic numismatics, with attribution shifting between Pannonian, Dacian, and various Danubian tribal contexts depending on the decade and the scholar. No issuing authority can be confirmed with certainty, and hoard evidence remains the primary tool for mapping distribution. The Kostial collection itself drew heavily from Eastern European find groups, giving pieces like this one their best available provenance anchor.