See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Kugelwange Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Tetradrachm (4)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Stylized horse prancing or rearing to the left, executed in the abstracted Celtic interpretation of the Macedonian reverse type. The horse's body is rendered with smooth, voluminous forms, and the mane is depicted as a series of curved, spiral, and pellet-tipped tresses in the La Tène decorative tradition. A large annulet with a central pellet (ring-and-dot motif) appears prominently in the upper field above the horse's back. Additional pellets are scattered in the field, and a vestigial charioteer or rider element may be suggested by abstract linear forms. No legend or inscription present.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The "Kugelwange" — literally "ball cheek" — designation refers to a highly stylized die tradition in which the facial features of the prototype Macedonian tetradrachm have been reduced to abstract geometric forms, a process of deliberate artistic transformation rather than degradation. Celtic die cutters working somewhere in the middle Danube region inherited Philip II's coinage as a monetary model but had no interest in naturalistic portraiture. Attribution remains genuinely contested; Kostial and Göbl assign overlapping regional ranges across modern Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania without consensus.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE