Tetradrachm Imitation of Tetradrachm of Philip III of Macedon

صادرکننده Getae
سال 300 BC - 201 BC
نوع Standard circulation coin
ارزش Tetradrachm (4)
واحد پول Drachm
ترکیب Silver
وزن 16.76 g
قطر
ضخامت
شکل Round (irregular)
تکنیک Hammered
جهت
حکاک(ها)
در گردش تا
مرجع(ها) CCCBM 1#I 185, Kostial#904, Pink#580, 582, Preda MGD#p.LXXII 1-3, Castelin#1345
توضیحات روی سکه Head of Herakles right, wearing lion-skin.
خط روی سکه
نوشته‌های روی سکه
توضیحات پشت سکه Zeus Aëtophoros seated left. Eagle on his extended right hand, and a sceptre in his right hand. Sun and `double axe` monogram in left field.
خط پشت سکه
نوشته‌های پشت سکه ΦΙΛΙΠΠΟΥ
لبه
ضرابخانه
تیراژ ضرب ND (300 BC - 201 BC) - -
شناسه Numisquare 1221269560
اطلاعات تکمیلی

Historical Context: This silver tetradrachm is a Getae imitation of a type originally issued by Philip III Arrhidaeus of Macedon (323-317 BC). Struck by the Getae, a Thracian confederation in the Lower Danube, between 300-201 BC, it reflects the widespread adoption of prestigious Hellenistic coinage. These imitations were crucial currency, signifying Macedonian economic influence and the Getae’s developing economic and political structures during the early Hellenistic period.

Artistry: The artistic execution typically follows the Macedonian prototype: obverse features Herakles’ head in the Nemean lion-skin; reverse depicts Zeus Aëtophoros enthroned with eagle and scepter. However, Getae issues often show distinct stylistic departure. Local die-cutters interpreted Hellenistic models with varying fidelity, resulting in a more stylized, sometimes abstract, and occasionally cruder aesthetic. Legends are frequently blundered or absent, highlighting the imitative nature.

Technical/Grading: Weighing 16.76 grams, this tetradrachm maintains a standard consistent with its Macedonian prototype. Technical strike qualities for Getae imitations are often inconsistent. High-points, like Herakles’ hair and lion-skin on the obverse, or Zeus’s head and the eagle on the reverse, may exhibit weakness. Off-center strikes, irregular flans, and incomplete impressions are characteristic, reflecting local production challenges and varying minting expertise. Overall condition is vital for assessing the distinctive local style.

×