See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Honter Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Celticised laureate and bearded head of Zeus facing right, rendered in a bold, stylised Celtic interpretation of the Macedonian prototype. The wreath, composed of large, schematically rendered laurel leaves, dominates the upper field and flows behind the head in an exuberant, abstracted manner characteristic of Eastern Celtic die-cutting. The facial features — brow, nose, and beard — are rendered with simplified but vigorous relief, retaining the general physiognomy of the original Macedonian model while exhibiting pronounced Celtic artistic stylisation. No legend or inscription appears in the field.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The "Honter type" designation traces to Johann Honterus, the 16th-century Transylvanian humanist and cartographer whose collected finds from the Carpathian Basin helped bring early Celtic coinage in the region to scholarly attention. These tetradrachms were struck by tribes operating in what is now roughly modern Romania and Hungary, communities that absorbed Macedonian monetary conventions following Alexander's campaigns without ever being subject to Macedonian political authority. The copying was economic mimicry, not tribute.

The Göbl reference places this piece within a tightly defined stylistic cluster, useful for attribution but insufficient to pin down a single issuing group with confidence.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE