Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | East Noricum |
|---|---|
| Year | 200 BC - 1 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 10.19 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Bare male head facing left, adorned with a prominent three-strand pearl diadem rendered in bold relief; the hair is depicted in a stylised Celtic manner with large, rounded locks. A torque or pellet device is visible beneath the eye, a characteristic auxiliary symbol of the Gjurgjevac type. The facial features are rendered in the abstracted, plastic Celtic artistic tradition, with a broad jaw and pronounced brow. The flan is irregular and the relief shows characteristic die wear consistent with a hammered Celtic issue. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (200 BC - 1 BC) |
| Additional information |
The Gjurgjevac type takes its name from the Croatian town near which a significant hoard concentration was found, placing the coin's circulation zone firmly in the Drava River corridor — a region that served as a buffer between Norican tribal territory and the expanding Celtic settlements to the south. East Norican tetradrachms of this class represent a localized adaptation of the broader Macedonian weight standard, progressively debased and stylistically abstracted over generations of local die-cutting. Kostial's classification remains the primary reference because no systematic die study has superseded it.