See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Dachreiter Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Tetradrachm (4)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Stylised riderless horse advancing to the left in a prancing posture, rendered in a bold, schematised Celtic idiom with a beaded mane and dotted body contour. Above the horse's back appear two symbols in the upper field: a pellet-and-ring motif to the upper left and a rayed rosette or star to the upper right, both characteristic decorative elements of Eastern Celtic coinage. The tail of the horse is depicted in a distinctive curved, beaded or combed style. The composition fills the broad, slightly convex flan, with no exergual line or inscription, consistent with the aniconic, legend-free tradition of this Celtic series.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (300 BC - 201 BC)
Additional information

The "Dachreiter" — literally "roof rider" — designation refers to the abstract horseman motif that Celtic die-cutters derived from the Philip II tetradrachm prototype, distorted across generations of copying until the original Macedonian imagery became almost unrecognizable. These eastern Celtic issues circulated through territories roughly corresponding to modern Slovakia, Hungary, and the western Ukrainian steppe, passing through communities that had no direct contact with the Hellenistic world that inspired them.

Attribution to a specific tribe remains genuinely unsettled. The Kostial and Göbl classifications organize these coins typologically, not ethnically.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE