Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Apollokopf-Dickschrötling Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Facing head of Apollo, rendered in a highly stylised Celtic interpretation of the Greek prototype, with large almond-shaped eyes, a broad nose, and slightly parted lips. The hair is arranged in thick, schematically rendered locks falling to either side of the face, surmounted by a laurel wreath with prominent berries depicted in a decorative, almost abstract manner. The portrait fills the broad, thick flan characteristic of the Dickschrötling type, with a beaded border partially visible at the periphery.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Plain
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Eastern Celtic silver coinage of this period derives ultimately from the Macedonian tetradrachms of Philip II, absorbed and progressively abstracted by Celtic die-cutters over successive generations until the original prototype became barely legible. The "Apollokopf-Dickschrötling" designation — literally "thick flan" — reflects a consistent striking convention among certain eastern groups who maintained higher module flans even as broader Celtic minting diverged toward thinner, broader planchets.

Attribution to a specific tribe or region remains unresolved. Göbl's classification placed related types across a broad arc from the middle Danube basin eastward, and die studies have not yet narrowed the issuing authority with confidence.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT