See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Tetradrachm Apollokopf-Dickschrötling Type

Issuer Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Year 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Facing head of Apollo, rendered in a highly stylised Celtic interpretation of the Greek prototype, with large almond-shaped eyes, a broad nose, and slightly parted lips. The hair is arranged in thick, schematically rendered locks falling to either side of the face, surmounted by a laurel wreath with prominent berries depicted in a decorative, almost abstract manner. The portrait fills the broad, thick flan characteristic of the Dickschrötling type, with a beaded border partially visible at the periphery.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Eastern Celtic silver coinage of this period derives ultimately from the Macedonian tetradrachms of Philip II, absorbed and progressively abstracted by Celtic die-cutters over successive generations until the original prototype became barely legible. The "Apollokopf-Dickschrötling" designation — literally "thick flan" — reflects a consistent striking convention among certain eastern groups who maintained higher module flans even as broader Celtic minting diverged toward thinner, broader planchets.

Attribution to a specific tribe or region remains unresolved. Göbl's classification placed related types across a broad arc from the middle Danube basin eastward, and die studies have not yet narrowed the issuing authority with confidence.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE