Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Tetradrachm Alexander III Type

Uitgever Uncertain Eastern European Celts
Jaar 300 BC - 201 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Silver
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Zeus Aëtophoros enthroned to the left on a plain throne with ball-footed legs, his muscular upper body bare and his lower body draped in a himation. In his extended right hand he holds an eagle, and in his left he grasps a long scepter; a stylized eagle or bird symbol appears in the upper left field. The Greek legend ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ runs vertically along the right field within a beaded border, rendered in a somewhat irregular but legible Celtic hand following the Macedonian prototype.
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage ND (300 BC - 201 BC)
Aanvullende informatie

Celtic tribes across the Danube basin began striking imitations of Alexander III's coinage in the late 4th century BC, initially as close copies before progressively abstracting the designs across generations of die-cutters who may never have seen the Greek originals. This particular type, attributed to uncertain eastern European Celtic issuers, belongs to a tradition in which monetary function and artistic interpretation diverged so completely that the prototypes are sometimes unrecognizable without the reference sequence. The Göbl classification system remains the primary framework for sorting these issues, though attribution to specific tribes or regions is often provisional given the absence of controlled archaeological findspot data.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT