Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Eastern European Celts |
|---|---|
| Year | 300 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Zeus Aëtophoros enthroned to the left on a plain throne with ball-footed legs, his muscular upper body bare and his lower body draped in a himation. In his extended right hand he holds an eagle, and in his left he grasps a long scepter; a stylized eagle or bird symbol appears in the upper left field. The Greek legend ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ runs vertically along the right field within a beaded border, rendered in a somewhat irregular but legible Celtic hand following the Macedonian prototype. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (300 BC - 201 BC) |
| Additional information |
Celtic tribes across the Danube basin began striking imitations of Alexander III's coinage in the late 4th century BC, initially as close copies before progressively abstracting the designs across generations of die-cutters who may never have seen the Greek originals. This particular type, attributed to uncertain eastern European Celtic issuers, belongs to a tradition in which monetary function and artistic interpretation diverged so completely that the prototypes are sometimes unrecognizable without the reference sequence. The Göbl classification system remains the primary framework for sorting these issues, though attribution to specific tribes or regions is often provisional given the absence of controlled archaeological findspot data.