カタログ
| 発行体 | Dia |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 85 BC - 65 BC |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| 通貨 | Drachm |
| 材質 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 8.94 g |
| 直径 | 21 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | SNG BM Black Sea#1559 |
| 表面の説明 | Head of youthful Dionysos to right, wearing ivy wreath. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | |
| 表面の銘文 | |
| 裏面の説明 | Panther skin and thyrsos on cista mystica; monograms around. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | Greek |
| 裏面の銘文 |
ΔΙΑΣ (Translation: Dia) |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (85 BC - 65 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 6806768610 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This Tetrachalkon, issued by the city of Dia between 85 and 65 BC, places it squarely within the tumultuous reign of Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus, during his protracted conflicts with the Roman Republic. Dia, likely a dependent city or territory within Mithridates' vast Black Sea empire, minted this bronze coinage to support his military and economic endeavors. These issues underscore Mithridates' significant control over the region and his strategic efforts to maintain a robust economy amidst the Second and Third Mithridatic Wars, crucial for funding his resistance against Rome.
Artistry: Reflecting the sophisticated Hellenistic stylistic school prevalent in the Pontic kingdom, this coin likely features an idealized portrait of Mithridates VI on the obverse, rendered with considerable realism and dynamic expression, a hallmark of royal Hellenistic portraiture. While the specific engraver remains anonymous, the design would have aimed to project the monarch's power and divine favor. The reverse typically bears a civic emblem or a local deity, executed with attention to detail characteristic of the period, demonstrating the artistic capabilities available to Mithridates' mints.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, this 21mm Tetrachalkon weighing 8.94 grams would exhibit typical qualities for its fabric. High-points for wear and strike would include the highest relief elements of any portrait (hair, brow, nose) on the obverse, and prominent features of the reverse device (e.g., musculature of an animal, folds of drapery). Expect potential for minor off-centering or areas of weaker strike, common in ancient bronze issues due to die wear or insufficient striking pressure. The overall preservation of surface quality and patination are critical factors in assessing its technical grade.