Katalog
| Emitent | Amisos |
|---|---|
| Rok | 85 BC - 65 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nominał | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| Waluta | Drachm |
| Skład | Bronze |
| Waga | 5.7 g |
| Średnica | 20 mm |
| Grubość | 2 mm |
| Kształt | Round (irregular) |
| Technika | Hammered |
| Orientacja | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Rytownik(zy) | |
| W obiegu do | |
| Źródło(a) | SNG BM Black Sea#1177-1191, GCV#3642 |
| Opis awersu | Gorgoneion on aegis (shield). |
|---|---|
| Pismo awersu | |
| Legenda awersu | |
| Opis rewersu | Nike advancing right, holding wreath and palm branch. |
| Pismo rewersu | Greek |
| Legenda rewersu |
ΑΜΙ ΣΟΥ (Translation: Amisos) |
| Krawędź | Rough |
| Mennica | |
| Nakład |
ND (85 BC - 65 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 6381859760 |
| Dodatkowe informacje |
Historical Context: This Tetrachalkon, issued by Amisos between 85 and 65 BC, places it squarely within the tumultuous Mithridatic Wars, marking King Mithridates VI Eupator's fierce resistance against Roman expansion. Amisos, a vital Pontic port and royal residence, was central to his kingdom. The continued production of bronze coinage like this tetrachalkon highlights Mithridates' assertion of sovereignty and economic stability, crucial for local commerce and military payments amidst his protracted struggle.
Artistry: The coin's design adheres to the classical Hellenistic artistic tradition favored by the Pontic kingdom. While engravers remain anonymous, the quality reflects a skilled mint workshop. Typical obverse types for this series feature a finely rendered head of Dionysus, wreathed with ivy, or sometimes Zeus. The reverse often displays symbols pertinent to Pontic cults or royalty, such as the cista mystica with a serpent emerging, or a star and crescent, executed with characteristic Hellenistic naturalism.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a bronze flan (5.7 grams, 20 mm), this tetrachalkon exhibits typical characteristics of ancient bronze issues. High-points, such as the hair and ivy wreath on the obverse or the cista's lid on the reverse, are often susceptible to wear or strike weakness. The flan, likely cast, may present minor irregularities. Centering and strike pressure varied, leading to areas of partial detail, though well-preserved examples reveal the underlying artistic intent.