Tetrachalkon - Mithridates VI

Emitent Amisos
Rok 85 BC - 65 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Nominał Tetrachalkon (1⁄12)
Waluta Drachm
Skład Bronze
Waga 7.2 g
Średnica 21.5 mm
Grubość
Kształt Round (irregular)
Technika Hammered
Orientacja Variable alignment ↺
Rytownik(zy)
W obiegu do
Źródło(a) SNG BM Black Sea#1218, SNG Stancomb#704, SNG Copenhagen#165
Opis awersu Bust of Amazon right, wearing wolfskin headdress
Pismo awersu
Legenda awersu
Opis rewersu Nike walking right, holding wreath in right hand, palm over left shoulder.
Pismo rewersu Greek
Legenda rewersu AMI-ΣOY
(Translation: Amisos)
Krawędź Plain
Mennica
Nakład ND (85 BC - 65 BC) - -
ID Numisquare 4970296730
Dodatkowe informacje

Historical Context: Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus (120-63 BC), was a formidable adversary of Rome. This Tetrachalkon from Amisos, a key Pontic city and royal residence, was issued between 85-65 BC. This period encompasses the latter Mithridatic Wars, a time of intense conflict as Mithridates battled Roman generals. The coinage served as a crucial instrument of propaganda and economic stability, reflecting the king's enduring power and the city's strategic importance.

Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, the artistry of this Tetrachalkon aligns with robust Hellenistic stylistic traditions prevalent in the Pontic kingdom. Obverse designs commonly feature idealized portraits of deities such as Zeus or Athena, or sometimes the king himself, imbued with divine attributes. The reverse typically displays symbolic representations pertinent to Pontus or Amisos, such as an eagle standing on a thunderbolt, or a star and crescent, executed with considerable detail for a bronze issue. The dies often exhibit a powerful, classical influence.

Technical/Grading: For grading, critical high-points on the obverse include the highest strands of hair, forehead, and cheekbone of the depicted deity or ruler. On the reverse, details such as the eagle's breast, wingtips, or the points of the star and crescent would show wear first. Technical strike quality often varies; well-centered examples with sharp details on both sides are prized. Flan quality can range from irregular to neatly rounded, and die wear, though present, typically allows for decipherable legends and clear primary motifs on finer specimens.

×