カタログ
| 発行体 | Amisos |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 85 BC - 65 BC |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| 通貨 | Drachm |
| 材質 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 7.2 g |
| 直径 | 21.5 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | SNG BM Black Sea#1218, SNG Stancomb#704, SNG Copenhagen#165 |
| 表面の説明 | Bust of Amazon right, wearing wolfskin headdress |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | |
| 表面の銘文 | |
| 裏面の説明 | Nike walking right, holding wreath in right hand, palm over left shoulder. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | Greek |
| 裏面の銘文 |
AMI-ΣOY (Translation: Amisos) |
| 縁 | Plain |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (85 BC - 65 BC) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 4970296730 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus (120-63 BC), was a formidable adversary of Rome. This Tetrachalkon from Amisos, a key Pontic city and royal residence, was issued between 85-65 BC. This period encompasses the latter Mithridatic Wars, a time of intense conflict as Mithridates battled Roman generals. The coinage served as a crucial instrument of propaganda and economic stability, reflecting the king's enduring power and the city's strategic importance.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, the artistry of this Tetrachalkon aligns with robust Hellenistic stylistic traditions prevalent in the Pontic kingdom. Obverse designs commonly feature idealized portraits of deities such as Zeus or Athena, or sometimes the king himself, imbued with divine attributes. The reverse typically displays symbolic representations pertinent to Pontus or Amisos, such as an eagle standing on a thunderbolt, or a star and crescent, executed with considerable detail for a bronze issue. The dies often exhibit a powerful, classical influence.
Technical/Grading: For grading, critical high-points on the obverse include the highest strands of hair, forehead, and cheekbone of the depicted deity or ruler. On the reverse, details such as the eagle's breast, wingtips, or the points of the star and crescent would show wear first. Technical strike quality often varies; well-centered examples with sharp details on both sides are prized. Flan quality can range from irregular to neatly rounded, and die wear, though present, typically allows for decipherable legends and clear primary motifs on finer specimens.