目录
| 发行方 | Amisos |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 85 BC - 65 BC |
| 类型 | Standard circulation coin |
| 面值 | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| 货币 | Drachm |
| 材质 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 7.2 g |
| 直径 | 21.5 mm |
| 厚度 | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 制作工艺 | Hammered |
| 方向 | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 雕刻师 | |
| 流通至 | |
| 参考资料 | SNG BM Black Sea#1218, SNG Stancomb#704, SNG Copenhagen#165 |
| 正面描述 | Bust of Amazon right, wearing wolfskin headdress |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | |
| 正面铭文 | |
| 背面描述 | Nike walking right, holding wreath in right hand, palm over left shoulder. |
| 背面文字 | Greek |
| 背面铭文 |
AMI-ΣOY (Translation: Amisos) |
| 边缘 | Plain |
| 铸币厂 | |
| 铸造量 |
ND (85 BC - 65 BC) - - |
| Numisquare 编号 | 4970296730 |
| 附加信息 |
Historical Context: Mithridates VI Eupator, King of Pontus (120-63 BC), was a formidable adversary of Rome. This Tetrachalkon from Amisos, a key Pontic city and royal residence, was issued between 85-65 BC. This period encompasses the latter Mithridatic Wars, a time of intense conflict as Mithridates battled Roman generals. The coinage served as a crucial instrument of propaganda and economic stability, reflecting the king's enduring power and the city's strategic importance.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, the artistry of this Tetrachalkon aligns with robust Hellenistic stylistic traditions prevalent in the Pontic kingdom. Obverse designs commonly feature idealized portraits of deities such as Zeus or Athena, or sometimes the king himself, imbued with divine attributes. The reverse typically displays symbolic representations pertinent to Pontus or Amisos, such as an eagle standing on a thunderbolt, or a star and crescent, executed with considerable detail for a bronze issue. The dies often exhibit a powerful, classical influence.
Technical/Grading: For grading, critical high-points on the obverse include the highest strands of hair, forehead, and cheekbone of the depicted deity or ruler. On the reverse, details such as the eagle's breast, wingtips, or the points of the star and crescent would show wear first. Technical strike quality often varies; well-centered examples with sharp details on both sides are prized. Flan quality can range from irregular to neatly rounded, and die wear, though present, typically allows for decipherable legends and clear primary motifs on finer specimens.