Tetrachalkon

发行方 Magnetes
年份 167 BC - 150 BC
类型 Standard circulation coin
面值 Tetrachalkon (1⁄12)
货币 Drachm
材质 Bronze
重量 9.36 g
直径 21.0 mm
厚度
形状 Round (irregular)
制作工艺 Hammered
方向
雕刻师
流通至
参考资料 BCD Thessaly I#1179, BCD Thessaly II#409, Rogers#345-346, SNG Munich 12#98
正面描述 Laureate head of Zeus to left
正面文字
正面铭文
背面描述 The centaur Chiron moving right, holding branch over his left shoulder. Below, monogram of ΔΗ and (here off the flan) wheat ear in exergue
背面文字 Greek
背面铭文 ΜΑΓΝΗΤΩ Ν
边缘
铸币厂
铸造量 ND (167 BC - 150 BC) - -
Numisquare 编号 1047886300
附加信息

Historical Context: This Tetrachalkon, issued by the Magnetes between 167 and 150 BC, reflects a pivotal period in Thessalian history. Following Rome's victory in the Third Macedonian War and the dissolution of the Antigonid kingdom, the Magnetes, a prominent Thessalian ethnos, experienced a resurgence of civic autonomy. This bronze coinage, intended for local circulation, underscores their economic self-sufficiency and distinct identity during the early Roman protectorate, before the region's full integration into the Roman provincial system. It serves as a tangible record of their administrative and commercial activities.

Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, typical for bronze issues of this era, the coin's design would have adhered to the prevailing Hellenistic stylistic conventions. Common themes for Magnetes coinage often include depictions of Poseidon, a significant deity for their coastal location, or local nymphs and heroes. Such designs generally exhibit idealized forms characteristic of the period, though perhaps with less intricate detail than contemporary silver issues. The artistry would aim to convey civic pride and religious devotion through recognizable iconography, serving as a visual identifier for the community.

Technical/Grading: This Tetrachalkon, weighing 9.36 grams and measuring 21.0 mm, falls within the expected parameters for the type. Bronze issues of this period frequently exhibit variable strike quality, often with minor off-centering or incomplete flan coverage, due to the production methods. Key areas for assessing wear and strike would include the highest points of the obverse portrait, such as the hair or facial features, and prominent elements of the reverse device. The original surface would likely have developed a natural patina, which is crucial for preservation and authentication.

×