Katalog
| Emittent | Homolion |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 350 BC |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Nennwert | Tetrachalkon (1⁄12) |
| Währung | Drachm |
| Material | Bronze |
| Gewicht | 9.23 g |
| Durchmesser | 21.0 mm |
| Dicke | |
| Form | Round (irregular) |
| Prägetechnik | Hammered |
| Ausrichtung | |
| Stempelschneider | |
| Im Umlauf bis | |
| Referenz(en) | SNG Copenhagen#72, BCD Thessaly I#1064, Rogers#257 |
| Aversbeschreibung | Bearded head of Philoktetes to right, wearing conical pilos |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | |
| Averslegende | |
| Reversbeschreibung | Serpent coiled to right, behind head, small bunch of grapes |
| Reversschrift | Greek |
| Reverslegende | ΟΜΟΛΙ ΚΟΝ |
| Rand | |
| Prägestätte | |
| Auflage |
ND (-350) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 1027838370 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Historical Context: This Tetrachalkon, issued by the Thessalian city of Homolion circa 350 BC, links to a period of shifting power. Homolion, a minor polis in Magnesia, minted this bronze coinage, underscoring its economic autonomy and local self-governance. This era saw Philip II of Macedon's growing influence in Thessaly. Homolion's continued currency issuance reflects its enduring, though precarious, independence amidst regional hegemonies, supporting daily commerce.
Artistry: While the engraver remains anonymous, typical for bronze issues, the coin exemplifies the Classical Greek stylistic school prevalent in Thessaly. The obverse likely features a local deity or nymph, such as Zeus Homoloios, rendered with dignified realism. The reverse typically displays a local symbol, perhaps a horse or a trident, signifying civic identity. Artistic execution, though in bronze, aimed for clarity and recognition, reflecting local cults and pride.
Technical/Grading: Struck on a substantial bronze flan weighing 9.23 grams and measuring 21.0 millimeters, this Tetrachalkon served local commerce. For strike quality, assess die centering and strike evenness, often variable on bronze. High points, like hair or facial features, or animal musculature, are susceptible to wear. Overall detail preservation and die state (fresh versus worn) determine its numismatic grade and aesthetic appeal.