Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Stater - Uncertain Dynast
| Issuer | Lycia, Dynasts of |
|---|---|
| Year | 500 BC - 460 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Incuse square punch bearing a geometric multi-rayed star or pinwheel pattern, formed by intersecting diagonal and orthogonal lines radiating from a central point to the corners and midpoints of the square, creating eight triangular sections. The incuse is deeply impressed and nearly fills the entire reverse field, consistent with early Archaic Greek coin-making technique. The design is crisp and symmetrical, with sharp ridges defining each ray. No legend or inscription is present. This type of incuse reverse is characteristic of Lycian dynastic staters of the late Archaic period. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Lycian dynastic coinage of this period predates any standardized political authority in the region — these issues were struck by local rulers operating under loose Persian suzerainty, each maintaining enough autonomy to mint independently. The "uncertain dynast" attribution reflects a genuine scholarly impasse: without inscriptions or iconographic anchors secure enough to assign a name, pieces like this remain administratively orphaned despite decades of specialist work, including Müseler's systematic catalog attempts to sort the series by die linkage and stylistic grouping.