Stater - Nikokrates, Philoxenides and Petraios

Emitent Thessalian League
Rok 50 BC - 40 BC
Typ Standard circulation coin
Hodnota Silver Stater (3)
Měna Drachm
Složení Silver
Hmotnost 6.19 g
Průměr
Tloušťka
Tvar Round (irregular)
Technika Hammered
Orientace
Rytci
V oběhu do
Reference BCD Thessaly I#1388, SNG Copenhagen#298
Popis líce Head of Zeus to right, wearing oak wreath and behind, ΝΙΚΟΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ
Písmo líce Greek
Opis líce ΝΙΚΟΚΡΑΤΟΥΣ
Popis rubu Athena Itonia striding right, hurling spear with her right hand and extending shield in her left. To right, palm branch, above the spear, ΦΙΛΟΞ-ΕΝΙΔΟΥ and in exergue, ΠΕΤΡΑΙΟΣ
Písmo rubu Greek
Opis rubu ΘΕΣΣΑ ΛΩΝ ΦΙΛΟΞ ΕΝΙΔΟΥ ΠΕΤΡΑΙΟΣ
Hrana
Mincovna
Náklad ND (50 BC - 40 BC) - -
ID Numisquare 8560552300
Další informace

Historical Context: This silver stater, issued by the Thessalian League between 50 and 40 BC, dates to a period of profound Roman influence and internal political maneuvering. The names Nikokrates, Philoxenides, and Petraios represent a collegial magistracy, reflecting the League's semi-autonomous status under Roman suzerainty. Thessaly, strategically important, was often entangled in the tumultuous Roman civil wars. The continued production of staters underscores the region's economic resilience and the League's authority amidst external pressures.

Artistry: While a specific engraver is not identifiable, the coin's design adheres to established Hellenistic artistic traditions prevalent in Thessalian coinage. The obverse likely features a prominent deity, often Zeus or Apollo, rendered with civic formality. The reverse, a hallmark of Thessaly, would typically depict a horse or mounted rider, symbolizing the region's famed cavalry and equestrian heritage. The robust, yet detailed, execution reflects a stylistic school emphasizing clear civic identity and local pride, with magistrates' names prominently displayed.

Technical/Grading: At 6.19 grams, this silver stater aligns with late Thessalian League weight standards, which saw a slight reduction from earlier periods. Key points for technical evaluation include the sharpness of the magistrate names, the intricate details of the horse's musculature and mane, and the clarity of the obverse deity's facial features. Strike quality, flan centering, and die axis consistency are crucial. A well-struck example exhibits full detail on all devices, with minimal wear to the high points.

×