Каталог
| Эмитент | Copia |
|---|---|
| Год | 193 BC - 150 BC |
| Тип | Standard circulation coin |
| Номинал | Semis (1/2) |
| Валюта | As |
| Состав | Bronze |
| Вес | 5.78 g |
| Диаметр | 21 mm |
| Толщина | |
| Форма | Round (irregular) |
| Техника | Hammered |
| Ориентация | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Гравёр(ы) | |
| В обращении до | |
| Каталожные номера | HN Italy#1936 Copenhagen#1519 |
| Описание аверса | Veiled and turreted female head to right; behind, S (mark of value). |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | |
| Надписи аверса | |
| Описание реверса | Cornucopiae; to left, L.C.Q. |
| Письменность реверса | Latin |
| Надписи реверса | L.C.Q COPIA |
| Гурт | |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (193 BC - 150 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1403038080 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: This bronze Semis was issued by the Roman colony of Copia between 193 BC and 150 BC. Founded in 193 BC on the former Greek site of Thurii, Copia was a key Roman outpost in Magna Graecia following the Second Punic War. This coinage reflects Rome's consolidation of power in southern Italy and the establishment of its economic systems. The use of Roman denominations like the Semis by a colonial mint highlights the region's Romanization during the mid-Republic.
Artistry: The specific engraver is unknown, but this Semis adheres to the Roman Republican colonial stylistic school, blending local influences with standard Roman iconography. The obverse commonly features a laureate head of Saturn, often with the denomination mark 'S'. The reverse frequently depicts a ship's prow, a ubiquitous symbol on Roman bronze coinage, alluding to Rome's naval power. Designs, though robust, display artistic refinement typical of provincial mints.
Technical/Grading: Struck in bronze, this Semis weighs 5.78 grams and measures 21 millimeters. For grading, key high-points on the Saturn obverse include the hair, ear, and facial features. On the prow reverse, the upper structure and hull details are critical. Colonial bronze issues often exhibit variable strike quality; minor off-centering is common, and flans can be irregular. Areas of weakness, particularly on the periphery, are not unusual. A well-centered example with clear types is highly desirable.