Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Sceat Series Z
| Issuer | Early Anglo-Saxon |
|---|---|
| Year | 680-710 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Facing bearded male head rendered in a bold, stylised Anglo-Saxon manner, occupying nearly the entire flan. The face displays large, almond-shaped eyes, a prominent nose, and a flowing beard indicated by incised lines below the chin. A radiate or diademed crown is suggested by projecting elements above the head. A pseudo-legend of debased Latin characters runs around the periphery within a beaded border, retaining no intelligible inscription. The overall treatment is characteristic of the degenerate portrait tradition found across Series Z sceats. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Series Z sceattas were struck in the decades immediately following the Synod of Whitby, when Northumbrian ecclesiastical authority was consolidating and small-denomination silver coinage was proliferating rapidly across the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms without any centralized minting control. Attribution to a specific issuing authority remains genuinely unresolved — no mint site has been confirmed, and die-link studies by Metcalf suggest production was geographically concentrated but not definitively localized. The series is typologically distinct enough to be isolated, yet common enough that it clearly served active exchange rather than ceremonial or gift use.