Каталог
| Описание аверса | Stylized head to the left with between two and four strands of hair with balled ends. |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | |
| Надписи аверса | |
| Описание реверса | Horse galloping left; letters T and O above the horse and letter C below. |
| Письменность реверса | Latin |
| Надписи реверса | TOC |
| Гурт | |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (58 BC - 50 BC) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 3771218620 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: This Potin coin of the Sequani, dated to 58-50 BC, places it squarely within the tumultuous period of the Gallic Wars. The Sequani, a powerful Gallic tribe residing in the region of the Doubs and Saône rivers, found themselves at the epicenter of Julius Caesar's campaigns. Their coinage, predominantly in potin, served as crucial currency for local trade, tribute, and the payment of mercenaries, reflecting the economic and political pressures of Roman expansion. This issue underscores the tribe's enduring autonomy and economic activity even as their independence was increasingly threatened.
Artistry: Characteristic of Gallic numismatic art, this coin exhibits a highly stylized aesthetic rather than classical realism. While specific engravers remain anonymous, the design features a prominent horse, a ubiquitous and sacred motif in Celtic culture, often rendered in an abstract, almost geometric form. The "TOC" element, likely a monogram or symbolic device, further distinguishes this type, integrated into the overall design with a vigorous, albeit often unrefined, native sensibility. The artistic choices reflect tribal identity and cultural continuity amidst external influences.
Technical/Grading: Struck from potin, an alloy of copper, tin, and lead, this large module (18mm, 3.9g) coin typically exhibits characteristics associated with casting rather than crisp striking. High-points for preservation assessment would include the horse's head, mane, and legs, along with the distinct features of the "TOC" element. Due to the casting process, surface quality can vary significantly, often presenting minor voids, rough textures, and less defined edges. Centering can also be inconsistent, but overall detail, when well-preserved, offers valuable insight into Gallic metallurgical practices.